Few words

A few words from CDRSEE Executive Director Zvezdana Kovac

A heartfelt thank you

The CDRSEE would like to extend its sincere gratitude to a number of individuals for their brilliant and truly outstanding efforts - to those who had the wisdom and insight to create the Centre and the JHP and others who led, authored, contributed and edited the books:

Founding Director and Honorary Board Member, Dr. John Brademas - for his ideas, vision and values that gave rise to the concept of the CDRSEE and the JHP and his effective action that helped found it.

First Chairman of the Board of Directors, Mathew  Nimetz - for his groundbreaking work and most generous support spanning almost two decades.

Former Chairman of the Board of Directors, Dr Erhard Busek – for his insight, tireless efforts and leadership of the CDRSEE for the past 10 years.

Vice Chairman of the Centre, Mr Nikos Efthymiadis – for displaying an extraordinary understanding of the need to promote democratic principles in Southeast Europe.

Mr Costa Carras, Historian, Rapporteur to the CDRSEE Board for the JHP – for his gifted qualities as a historian and mentor, his insightful leadership and vision of the JHP

Board Member and former Executive Director, Mr Nenad Sebek – for helping make the CDRSEE and JHP the brand names, his knowledge of the region, experience and fundraising efforts.

The History Education Committee: with its tremendous group of diverse, cultivated and intelligent historians who were instrumental in examining hundreds of historical sources and writing the books, in particular, Prof. Dr. Christina Koulouri, History Professor, Chair of the History Education Committee and Series Editor of the JHP workbooks, for her support, brilliant advice and endless patience in overseeing the entire project.

Last but far from least, to each and every one of the current and former Board members who have generously given their time and minds to both the CDRSEE and the JHP: Hannes Swoboda, Richard Schifter, Rigas Tzelepoglou, Selcuk Erez, Guus Heim ,Piro Misha, Saso Ordanoski, Elene Bruggisser, Ioannis Tsormpatzoglou, Elsa Ballauri, Pekin Baran, George David, Smaranda Enache, Zdravko Grebo, Vlasta Jalusic, Aleksandra Joksimovic, Maritta von Bieberstein Koch-Weser, Osman Kavala, Albert Koenders, Ivan Krastev, Fatos Lubonja, Antoinette Primatarova, Zarko Puhovski, Gazmend Pula, Dusan Reljic, Veton Surroi, Pieter Stek, Neslihan Tombul, Spiros Voyadzis.

We commend their dedication to this very important and essential cause in the region.

Read More

It is a new day for the Joint History Project

November 2016

Only 12 years ago, we published our first four books: the Joint History Workbooks for all the SEE countries. They were received warmly by many, but were strongly rejected by others. We were even accused by some of attempting to recreate history, and were judged in a manner usually reserved for enemies of state.

It was to be expected though - we knew that an unbiased, multi-perspective History workbook would be perceived as a serious obstacle and so we remained calm and steadfast in our determination to continue. Even though it was unpleasant, we were open to criticism and to what was considered to be inaccurate. In the end, however, we didn’t hear any arguments of this sort, but rather just remarks such as: “our country does not have enough primary sources, this or that cartoon presents our country in a bad light” and so on. We quickly understood that the people behind these critiques had not actually read our books, so with great patience, enthusiasm and dedication we managed to lower, and in some cases, silence the voices of those who rejected them. How did we do this? We encouraged them to read the books, we exchanged opinions, we initiated a debate with people responsible for the educational system, and here we are today: with the support of almost all the ministries of education in the Western Balkans, we are presenting two new volumes which deal with a much more controversial and sensitive period than those of the first volumes. I am proud to say that we have succeeded: our history education committee and hundreds of historians across Southeast Europe, have compiled the books which consist of 700 historical sources on the events from 1944 to 2008. Here, I would like to point out that these books do not replace the adopted textbook of national curricula in the region — but serve as additional teaching material for teaching history.

The first supporters of this project almost 20 years ago came from far away, from the USA: USAID, National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and the United States Institute for Peace; from Great Britain: Foreign Commonwealth Office; and from Ireland: Irishaid. Currently, the project, and the two new books which I present to you today, are generously supported by the European Commission, and I would like to express my gratitude and deep respect for those who understood how important these books could be. We are an NGO, one of thousands in Europe struggling for the opportunity to implement tremendous ideas. Our historians are among those thanks to whom history can be called a science. They are not the only ones of course. Our Board consists of people who have been dedicated to democracy and progress their whole lives, and they are not only ones either. Our staff members are tireless and passionate about their work. What all of us as a team have in common is dedication, enthusiasm and the unwavering belief that things can and will improve. We have worked together for the past 18 years and the success of this project is based on the winning combination of three elements: experts, financial and political support and unreserved dedication.

I would also like to express my gratitude to all the ministries of education in the region who are with us today and who showed understanding and believed that such a project can help their governments and states to progress. Education can set you free, and history education in particular can set entire nations and regions free from a heavy past through the simple power of knowledge and critical thought. I am delighted and proud that, at present, six ministries of education support our books. I would like to add that we are geographically situated in Europe, but European values are still lacking. As a side note of a more personal nature, I would like to draw your attention to the fact that I am from the Balkans, I was born and grew up in the Balkans. I won’t turn my speech into my personal story, but I do want to convey the message that there is not a single person who went through the traumatic war of the nineties who did not partly (let me express myself metaphorically) ‘die’ in some way. We are all aware of the fact that history should not repeat itself, but this most not become a sound-bite. These books are a reflection of this. Its methodology will help young people develop critical thought which in turn will help them grow into European citizens…

…So far, with the generous help of the European Commission, these two new workbooks have just been published - but only in English. This is what we have been able to accomplish so far. As the JHP is already very welcome in most of the Southeast European countries (the respective ministries of education will talk later of the reforms, aims and plans of their educational system, into which these books fit perfectly) – we have to do more, we haven’t finished our job yet! These books need to be read. They need to be translated into local languages, we need to train teachers to use these books, we need to bring them together in regional workshops and conferences. Based on the existing material, we would like to improve and produce documentaries, cartoons… We would like connect history teachers together both virtually through a webplatform and physically like when we brought together teachers from Serbia and other countries in Vukovar, in Mostar and Presevo… The gathering of teachers most not remain as isolated cases of cooperation but needs to become a tradition. We want to make a real impact, and we have only just started. We need to continue, our countries need to progress and we know they are capable of doing so, but we all have to be patient and persistent. Persistent, as it is not easy to connect and reconcile people who were at war against each other not so long ago, and patient-as it takes time for things to change… This is a process which requires time. I am certain we can show students how to broaden their views, how to examine contexts, to explore and develop compassion and empathy. We need to get them out of the comfort zone in order to help provide them with a more comfortable life.

Thank you very much for your attention, thank you for expressing support by being present here today. And thank you for your future support. We from the Balkans have succeeded in showing that we can also, for a change, export certain values and examples of good practice. This is our task and we are proud of it and not ashamed to ask for help to continue what we consider to be a noble, just and indispensable quest for reconciliation in the region. May the process we have begun be relentless, unfaltering and unstoppable.

Read More

History of the future

October 2016

The most exciting moment for us at the CDRSEE has arrived  -  the printing of the two new JHP workbooks is underway! Moreover, on November 15th , the workbooks – a rare example of a history book that deals with such a recent past - will be presented to the European Parliament at an event hosted by Ms Ulrike Lunacek, European Parliament Vice-President, and four other MEPs: Ms. Tanja Fajon, Mr. Eduard Kukan, Mr. Knut Fleckenstein and Mr. Ivan Jakovcic.

The event is entitled ‘History of the Future’, referring to the way in which  history should be taught in the future, and which reflects our belief that education, and history education, in particular, affects and shapes our future.

Covering the period from 1944 to 2008, we are offering teachers and students an opportunity to research and decide for themselves what happened during this period (which includes the sensitive years of the 1990s) using the relevant sources which provide them with the whole picture surrounding any event, without asking or even suggesting what the truth may be.  As with our first four books, we are not offering an interpretation, but rather a methodology for reading the history of any given time period.

Similar to a journey which will bring you to a desired destination, we believe that our team of 100 historians from across Southeast Europe under the leadership of Professor Christina Koulouri, will help you travel with an open mind – devoid of prejudice and guided by facts - to a destination where a better understanding of others can be found. It is only by observing others that we ‘see’ ourselves, and in doing so, we understand ourselves better – both our good qualities and our shortcomings.  This is a precondition for harmony, and only harmonious individuals, citizens and neighbours can help us to prosper and grow as human beings, emotionally and mentally. 

Read More

Dialogue and re-examination versus dissent and division

September 2016

Transcript of speech given upon reception of the jury award in the ‘Media Initiative of the Year’ category at the European Citizenship Awards 2016 ceremony in London on 12 September 2016

Okruzenje is a joint initiative of the CDRSEE and European Fund for the Balkans (EFB), financially supported by the German Foreign Ministry. We are grateful for their support as it enables us to implement the idea of gathering TV channels from the entire Western Balkans (the countries of ex-Yugoslavia and Albania) around a political TV show. Eight countries from the region exchange a news programme, for the first time ever after the wars of the 90s!

Okruzenje is in its fifth season now, and we are still the only programme broadcast at approximately the same time in all of these countries. I would like to underline this fact, as exchanging news between these countries is still unimaginable today -- unlike the entertainment programs which are still all “political-free” or “taboo-free”.

It all began when we managed to gather seven TV stations from five Western Balkan countries (Croatia, FYR of Macedonia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Serbia) together. Bluntly speaking, this was a result of our personal acquaintances — people from TV channels who knew who we were and who could trust us. They were also courageous enough to broadcast our programme despite the incredible animosity towards the idea of a joint news project. My praise goes to these people as well and I thank them for their extraordinary fearlessness!

In 2012 it was too early to start with something that perhaps recalled a ‘Yugo-nostalgic’ sentiment. We also feared that we would be accused of conspiracy - of having some “big names” or big power standing behind us and supporting us in creating a “horrible” plan of rebuilding Yugoslavia. 

To counter this, we were clear from the beginning: as our aim is not to put together broken pieces — but to provide opportunity with dialogue, to promote a civilized dialogue supported by facts and, in that manner, help recover and develop the broken pieces. We never wanted a new Yugoslavia.

We are now, as I’ve already mentioned, at the beginning of the fifth season. We completed the previous season with ten channels from eight countries of the Western Balkans on board! And we did what no one in TV history has ever done: we brought two prime ministers together in the same studio! In the past, we had the opportunity to obtain the statements of different prime ministers in one show, but never ever had them physically sitting together in the same studio. The success was even greater because they were not just any two ministers but those of Albania and Serbia - two countries with no record of collaboration for the past several decades; two countries whose relationship influences and even shapes the geopolitical map of the region. If you are aware of the history of the region and the animosities that exist today, what we did was inconceivable. We worked hard, very hard. We walked on tightropes constantly, but we believed in what we were doing and never gave up. Maybe we were lucky, but there is an expression in my language: “sreca prati hrabre” which means: fortune favors the brave.

Now, a word about the media in the Western Balkans: it is not free. There is a prime minister who says that journalists are scum! There are countries where people read the free press in secret … There is another prime minister who calls his political opponents in the parliament, in front of TV cameras – “idiots”. There is a country in the region whose journalists are forbidden to use the word ”region”, unless it refers to a region of western European countries … There are perfect laws in all the countries, but their implementation is almost zero! There is also poverty in the media: journalists are among the poorest citizens.

I am often asked how objective the media in the Balkans is …There is no absolute objectiveness, of course, as every media, everywhere, has its owner. The problem is not whether you are objective or subjective, the problem is the lack of decent, honest and dignified people in the media! Democracy is still practically non-existent in the region.

I am from the Balkans, I grew up in the Balkans and I can allow myself to say these things - I know my compatriots. They are hardworking and good people. However, the long-lasting autocratic regimes, as well as (consequently) lack of democratic tradition, and cultivation of true human values, metaphorically speaking, left a deep mark. People in the Balkans do not know how to debate; there is a lot of cacophony instead, where no one listens to anyone and, even if they could listen, they would not be able to hear one another.

We are trying to promote something which probably sounds very basic to you - the simple fact of speaking and listening to others. We are promoting the exchange of arguments supported by facts. Our guests from all over the region do not think the same — they often have quite different opinions. However, dissimilar views are always an occasion for re-examination and not hostility. There is no “sensitive topic” in Okruzenje — we talk openly about everything.

Perhaps you can now see why we earned the jury award in the ‘Media Initiative of the Year’ category at the European Citizenship Awards 2016 ceremony in London’s City Hall on 12 September 2016. We do hope that there will be Okruzenje/Vicinities in 2017,2018, 2019 … but it will depend upon those who fund us. We are willing to work hard on keeping neighbors gathered around the TV round table, as we deeply believe that the only way to solve problems is through discussion and dialogue and to this, there is no alternative.

Read More


July 2016

After the UK referendum and the initial reaction and analysis, two words began surfacing in the media coverage: youth and populism. And, like the old idiom on divorce goes, which applies to this situation as well, a good divorce is always better than a bad marriage, especially if children are involved. Yet, more than 60% of young people in UK voted to stay in the EU, and they are children of this obviously bad marriage. I am especially touched by their pain and tears. For their good, no one should celebrate and exult, as like we said, a good divorce is more than desired. The EU and the UK should help each other to survive and develop; there should be no blackmail, no bitterness, no revenge.

Young people are certain that disintegration is not better than integration. They know how much they benefit(ed) from the open borders, exchanges, comparisons, differences … While a union is not a necessity for cherishing these values, it does create an inspiring environment of mutual respect and acceptance, and these are a necessity. My hope lies in the young people-- smart, pure and fresh, those who will fight for the right values and who will oppose the expansion of populism,, the “winner” of the referendum and a serious threat to a liberal democratic system.

Populism is spreading all over Europe; it is not confined to Southeast European countries, and it seriously endangers Western democracy.  Today the UK, tomorrow somewhere else, and the superb idea of the EU may collapse? Certainly yes, if we do not find an answer to the question, “Why do around 80 percent of people agree that democracy is the best form of government, but only 30% believe that the voice of people is heard?”  We are witnessing the clash between the elite class and the “ordinary” people, but we should be aware that all those considered elite are not corrupt just as all ordinary people are not pure. A challenging time lies ahead, but I believe we are up to the challenge. For our youth, we must be.

Read More

We celebrate multiple perspectives

June 2016

For the fifth time, on June 2 we kicked off filming the new Okruzenje season. The number of national TV stations that broadcast this unique political talk show grows every year, and we can’t resist sharing with you our happiness and pride. With no intention of sounding pretentious, we celebrate this small anniversary knowing that we are on 10 TV stations across the Western Balkans because we earned it with credibility. We earned your trust. For the fifth year now, we have no hidden agenda, we work by following a professional code (which sadly has been forgotten on a large scale), and we are contributing to the institution of journalism that will not be a tool for flaming hatred, but rather a means to serve citizens by keeping them well informed and providing them with the opportunity to listen to a decent, civilized dialogue despite often diametrically opposing opinions.  

With this show, we undoubtedly made history when for the first time ever we managed to bring together two Prime Ministers in one TV studio, last August in Vienna during the WB Summit. The significance of that show was even more, as the two Prime Ministers were from Albania and Serbia, two countries whose relations have been frozen for the past 60 years, the impact of which extends to the whole region. 
This show was an example of many CDRSEE projects, first and foremost the Joint History Project, with which we prove that despite animosity, unresolved issues, prejudices and stereotypes, cooperation between two countries is possible. This requires effort and commitment, as both societies must change. It is a change that must reach deeply, with the same persistence that the negative was built upon, with the same on-going attention that allowed the negative feelings to thrive.

But it is a change that we know is possible, and we will not forget that, as we move ahead. Just last month, the Serbian European Movement organized a media opportunity to report on Albanian-Serbian relations. While at the conference the JHP garnered the most attention, yet it was covered only by popular news portal B92 -- and the coverage received 500 comments. Most of the comments were proof themselves of the need to promote our multi-perspective approach, as a society that is dependent on egotistical and ethnocentric ways is not able to put forth the requirements of modern society and prosperity. For that reason, we push ahead. 

But today -- today we celebrate the small but significant milestones that make up the CDRSEE's path of change. We celebrate comments on a news stories, and we celebrate multiple perspectives. And we celebrate that for the fifth time we have earned your unique trust and we enter the Okruzenje studio to tape a fresh, new season.

Read More

Towards real reconciliation

May 2016

This is an exciting year for the CDRSEE, a year which will prove that 18 years of diligent work of our respected Board of Directors, CDRSEE staff and numerous experts who have collaborated with us from the very beginning, was worth all the effort. The crown of our work, along with the anniversary of the 5th Okruzenje/Vicinities season, is the completion of our two new history workbooks. Two volumes on the most recent history (from 1945-2008) are being reviewed by eminent historians and experts, and we are happy to announce that the first critics prove that we did well when we dared to tackle the closest and the most painful period in modern times. We accepted the challenge and we confidently push ahead with it.

Real reconciliation after the wars of 1990s has never happened in the Western Balkans — and by this I refer to the reconciliation that can be brought to life if and only if we face what we have committed and what really happened. By producing the two new volumes, we are happy to contribute to such a mission.

The books are almost ready for printing, as the corrections that have to be made after reviews are meaningful but minor. Here is the first impression of one of four expert readers, Maria Todorova, a reputable historian and Gutgsell Professor of History at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: “Let me first say, how much I am in favor of the Joint History Project initiative and how much I admire the efforts to put it in practice. After the success  of the 4 existing volumes  -- the Ottoman Empire, States and Nations, the Balkan Wars, and the Second World War --  comes the period after the Second World War, usually defined as the Cold War, as well as the contemporary period, what the Germans call Zeitgeschichte. As a whole, I think that it achieves much of what is behind the ethos of the whole project, namely to present to students different sides of the same problem, to make them think and weigh different approaches and viewpoints.  In many ways, these are the more difficult volumes because of the enormity of material that has to be sifted and because of the closeness of the period and the strong memories or opinions bolstered by lived experience. I have been particularly impressed by the pedagogical side: the aptness of the QUESTIONS and TASKS which beautifully integrate the sources offered for interpretation.” 

By carefully designing the steps for reconciliation in the Western Balkans, we are optimistic that an understanding of the past will be useful to avoid repetition and will be a guide for a better future between the nations of the Balkan region.

Read More

Action as an alternative to fear

April 2016

In 2015, 389 terrorist attacks were recorded around the world, and in the first three months alone of 2016, the number of attacks reached 242! The situation took center stage, of course, after about 10 terrorist attacks rocked the heart of Europe in both years. I can't help but wonder whether this is supposed to mean the lives of Europeans and their well-being are more valuable than the lives of others. Why are we all Paris and Brussels and never Ankara, Bacha Khan, Burkina Faso…? We certainly cannot protect ourselves if we all do not care about others regardless of all the differences. 

Promoting European values, an expression that, lately, is popping up in many circles, sounds quite egocentric, I would dare to say. It may be carelessly used though, as its essence is deeply universal and human, so let’s rename the idea and give it the respect it needs.

We who live in Europe, and who do care about our neighborhood and the EU as a worthwhile political-economic union, are worried about both the efficiency and future of the union. As someone who used to live in a country that split into many independent pieces, I am very much in favour of a carefully and fairly composed bigger union.

But that Union -- unprepared to support the integration of immigrants, rigid when it comes to enlargement, tied up in a complicated administration -- must be ready for change, based on a wise, honest and open dialogue with everyone. It is the only alternative to fear, a whispered word that seeps into our lives and causes more damage than we initially realize. Action is only way to overcome it, and that can be taken when we stop contemplating and regretting what has not been done, and apply the essence of our European values -- let's say our neighbourhood values -- to the world.

Read More

"Isn't that confusing?”

February 2016

Two new volumes of our Joint History Project are shaping up. Teachers from across Southeast Europe, as well as representatives from six Ministries of Education, have briefly reviewed the first drafts, and the first reactions are promising—they give us hope that the books will become an indispensable part, even a milestone, in history education. Not that everyone is happy with the content, as there is no perfect history text, but everyone recognises the quality in the methodology and the impact the books can have on the education of our young generation.

It is not enough for us to produce the books, if they only remain on our shelves as good examples of how history could be taught in the classrooms. That’s why the support we have from the Ministries of Education, their recommendation for using the books, is of crucial importance -- this is what makes the books come alive, and this is what they should be. If our books make even a small impact toward better understanding, so-called critical thinking and awareness that everything is not only about us, then the effort of the team of historians and the CDRSEE has paid off.

None of us is happy with current education systems. We would all like to improve them. It requires not only the knowledge, but the courage -- a step out of the comfort zone where we are all happy with ourselves, and unhappy with others, where it is always someone’s else’s fault and never ours. In our books, you can find different sources for the same event—you can find another point of view. I see no better way to motivate students to think, to motivate them to explore and think.

Just recently, a journalist asked me, "Isn’t that confusing?" Yes, it is, if the students are not used to anything but one-sided approaches, if they are not interested in anything that is outside of their “backyards”. I think we owe it to our kids to “confuse” them, to wake them up, to motivate them to think, to get them out of the comfort zone and the daily routine. We do not offer them conclusions; we offer them the possibility to make their own conclusions.

Read More

Fatigue vs Self-sacrifice

January 2016

In my daily "watching the news" routine, two headlines recently caught my attention. One was "Hospitality Fatigue", and the other, "Empathy and self-sacrifice for Nobel Peace Prize", both referring to the refugee crisis in Europe. Where there is fatigue, there is no true hospitality, one might think at first glance. The headline, which was a bit disturbing to me, is, however, a red flag that something has to be done, as after receiving first aid, the million people who lost or left their homes need another type of help. Hospitality must be provided.  

Among the refugees, there are hundreds of thousands who will never return home. We must help with their integration; we must help them learn European values, as we also must learn about theirs. We can understand  hospitality fatigue, but we will, with all our heart, vote for those who promote empathy. We learn from each other, and that is a treasure we must make an effort to find.

There is nothing more powerful than education for changing the world for the better and raising awareness of humanity, which is above race and nations. The CDRSEE, using all its experience and knowledge gathered over the past 17 years, wants to contribute by reducing hospitality fatigue and increasing the chances that those who self-sacrifice will be recognised and awarded—because they are not doing that for a prize, but rather because they are human in the best sense of the word.

Read More